Power/Torque of a Plus 8 (supplement)
by Lorne Goldman

October 1998 (with later updates)
I didn't expect the response to the article Power of a Plus 8 that it has received. It has been fun answering the many questions and these have made me investigate even deeper and use wider sources to make the article more accurate since its original publication. It was also this deeper investigation that spawned the article entitled Made in the U.S.A. when I tried to reconcile the anomalies of some of the performance characteristics reported to me of U.S. Plus 8's.

Many of the responses have also noted that to define "power" simply as a horsepower function does not give an accurate idea of the performance of the car. One reader wrote me that "an ocean liner can create thousands of horsepower but still has lousy acceleration".  So true!

Many factors go into a full consideration of a car's performance. Suspension, aerodynamics, transmission performance, torque, steering, weight, and the braking system all play important roles along with the raw horsepower. However, some standard is necessary to continue this analysis and after a short straw poll, the power-to-weight ratio seems to be the popular consensus for a power performance yardstick.

The power-to-weight calculation used here is a measurement obtained by dividing the maximum net horsepower of the car by its weight and multiplying by 2000 to obtain the amount of horsepower per ton. 

The data used has been sourced from the Morgan Car Company but More often from various auto magazine tests, data form Morgan racers, literature specific to Plus 8's and the research done by Rover V8 experts familiar with Morgan variations. I have found that the figures of the Company are less exact than those of other sources. It is not uncommon in the auto industry to find manufacturer power claims at odds with the dynamometer evidence of other testers. This is most likely a result of the acceptance of Rover figures as verbatim.

On the other hand, differing configurations of the same engine will produce differing outputs and the Morgan configuration of the Rover V8 is more likely to hold more power depending on the exhaust system used for the Plus 8 being examined. For example, a Vitesse engine with cast manifolds and a single exhaust pipe producing 190 bhp, will produce more power with larger bore tubular manifolds and twin exhausts. The ECU of the injection system can be adjusted for the improved airflow up to 25% with the early flapper EFIs and automatically with the later cars up to 11%.

THE PLUS 8

N.B. I list only years where a change occurred).

YEAR
HORSEPOWER(hp)
 WEIGHT (lbs.)
POWER-TO-WEIGHT hp/ton
1968
160.5
1990
168.9
1971
160.5
1884
170.4
1973-74 143 1884 152.0
1976
155 1884 164.4
1982
157 1884 166.7
  1984*
205 1884 217.6
  1985*
192 1912 200.8
    1987**
190 1956 194.7
1988 172 1956 175.8
1989 164 1956  167.7
 1991 
191
2072
178.6
1998 (US Model) 4.0L
183
2250
166.2
1999 3.9L
 190.3
2072
183.7
1998-2000 4.6L
 (see note below)
  194.4
2072
187.3
2000-2004 (UK) 183 2072 177.74
2000-2004 (USA)
US Models are heavier 
183 2250
(from 3 US dealers) 
162.67
                                                                       *injection models only
                                                                       ** after 1986, all models produced were fuel injected (EFI)
                                                                       *** the potential power of ALL these engines is much higher  

Note On the 4.6 Morgan will regularly create a configuration that lowers the output of the engine and abandons the healthy parametres of the engine. The 4.6 Plus 8s have a hybrid system required when it was found that the 4.6 fueling system "could not fit under a Morgan bonnet", though I doubt that was the true reason as the GEMS fit without a bonnet issue when needed for the USA. For the 4.6, the earlier 3.9 hotwire system was used instead and the 3.9 eprom (chip) with 3.9 fueling solutions was retained rather substituting a chip designed for the significantly greater capacity of the 4.6. This explains the much lower-than-standard LR bhp that the Company indicates for this model. Re-chipping properly releases the true performance of this car and resolves the heating issues caused by the way too thin fueling solutions..which are even too thin for the 3.9s. It is absolutely remarkable the difference between a Morgan stock Hotwire 3.9 and even more so with the 4.6, when a twin exhaust and a proper fuel map is used. 

Other car data has been sourced from the auto magazines and the manufacturers involved. (I have provided this to give the reader a wider perspective and appreciation of the Plus 8 performance.) 


N.B. The post 1971 figures do not apply to U.S. models.. See Made in the U.S.A.

As can be seen, the ratio changes often and significantly. For example, the 1984 injected Plus 8 is a whopping 42.5% more powerful than the least powerful of the breed built from mid 1973 through most of 1976.

The figures for today's Plus 8 do not show the full picture. Had this Plus 8 remained as light and as "slim" as the original, it's extra torque would have made it speedier than most of this great line of cars. However, more cockpit comfort for the more "amply furbished" client, concessions to structural reinforcement and stylish looking larger wheels have considerably increased the weight, the girth, the length and the drag of a car that started off with the aerodynamic competence of a cathedral. This being said, it is heart warming to see how the models rank even with the best of today's sport cars.
                                                            Other Cars
MAKE & MODEL
YEAR
HORSEPOWER
WEIGHT
POWER-TO-WEIGHT
Morgan 4/4
1999
111
1909
116.3
Mazda Miata
1999
140
2299
121.8
Mercedes SLK
1999
185
2921
126.7
BMW Z-3 2.8
1999
189
2844
132.9
Morgan Plus 4
1999
136
2024
134.4
Porsche Boxster
1998
201
2822
142.0
Corvette
1999
345
3246
212.6
Porsche Turbo Carrara
1999
285
2654
  214.8/0

Note that on a power-to-weight analysis, ALL models of the Plus 8 comfortably exceed the new wave of roadsters. The 4/4 and Plus 4 also hold their own within this class and are very competitive price wise.

The Plus 8's can also hold their heads up when viewed with the more powerful examples of the main line traditional sports car field with +8s over the years producing anywhere from 71% to 101% of the big Porsche's power.

There will undoubtedly be cries that the wrong crtiteria was used here. I reiterate that its use was an arbitrary though consensus decision.. I have already happily admitted that factors other than power and weight strongly influence a sports car's performance though this measurement is definitively a more effective one than most. Lastly, let's not forget intrinsics. The Morgan Plus 8 comes fully loaded with these...always has.